Monday, 28 April 2014

April 25th

Task 1 - Respond to the following:



What are emotions?

 A strong feeling that comes from an individuals circumstances and/or relationships

Does physiological arousal come before or after



emotional experience?
The physical feelings achieved from situations that are emotionally stimulating.

Does thinking come before or after feeling?

 I think it comes after thinking, since we have to process the situation

Are emotions learned – or are they part of instinct?

They instinctive, you see babies that have obviously not learned anything that show signs of different emotions such as happiness, anger and confusion.

Are emotions useful – or just a legacy of our animal roots?
In a way they could be used as a moral compass, as something that makes you sad could be against what is perceived as right 

Are emotions for communication – or self knowledge and understanding?

Both, they can be used to understand other people and to communicate to other people without even talking with them, for example, you wouldn't want to bother someone that LOOKS angry, you can tell this just from recognizing the emotion on their faces. As for self understanding, it helps you understand your own situation 





Task 2:



Describe how your body feels when you are:



Scared
discomfort, unsure with your surroundings


Angry
Discomfort, hate towards someone/something


Sad
confused, disappointed 


Bored
Tired, lazy 


Anxious
excitement, nervousness 


Jealous
lust, want for attention


• In love
want for attention from someone, butterflies




Question: Can we change our emotion by changing our thinking?
Im not entirely sure of this, but i were to give my uninformed opinion on this matter, i would say that changing the way we think would not change our emotions, since emotions go deeper than just what we think.


Task 3:



Individually – then in groups - look at the following dilemmas – and decide what you

would do in each case.



TROLLEY DILEMMA



A runaway trolley is headed toward 5 people standing on a track. You are the controller of the tracks. The ONLY way to prevent their deaths is to switch the trolley onto a side track by flicking a switch – but that will definitely kill one person. What do you do?

 • What would you do?
I would switch the tracks and kill the one person/
• Why would you do it?
if it were completely necessary, you could not help it, and saving the life of 4 is far better than killing 5 people and not being able to save any


FOOTBRIDGE DILEMMA

You are now on a footbridge overlooking the trolley track. Another runaway trolley is heading toward – and will kill 5 people. You are standing next to Fat Tony on the bridge. If you push Tony onto the tracks in front of the trolley, it will kill Tony – but his size is sufficient to derail and stop the trolley preventing further death. Would it be right to push him?


• What would you do?
I would not push fat tony
• Why would you do it?
Because the death of those 5 people were out of my control, whereas if I pushed fat tony, his blood would be on my hands

LIFEBOAT DILEMMA

You and 6 others are on a lifeboat in icy waters – but 6 is too many people and it is beginning to sink. If you push a person overboard, the raft will not be washed over by the waves – and you will survive. Would it be right to push someone out of the boat?

 • What would you do?
Push someone over board, but only if they volunteered to die for the rest of us
• Why would you do it?
Because in the process you would be saving 5 people, instead of 6 people dying unecessarily

 HOSPITAL DILEMMA

You are a surgeon and 5 of your patients will die soon unless they get organ transplants. Each needs a different organ – heart, liver, kidney, lungs and pancreas. A nurse bursts into your office. “Great news, a visitor to the hospital has arrived – and has the same tissue type as all your patients. We can kill the visitor and save 5 patients.” Should you kill the visitor?


• What would you do?
I would not do it               
• Why would you do it?
It is morally wrong to kill someone in order to use them for other purposes unless they agreed to it and died of natural causes.

Come up with a response to all 4 dilemmas.


• Are all your decisions the same? Why/why not?
No they were all not, in situations where some ones death would be directly due to my actions I chose to not kill someone in order to save some people
What is the role of emotion in knowing what to do?

You consider the emotional result of your actions, and try to reason ways to make yourself feel better, buy telling yourself that you couldn't have done anything anyways. This is to suppress the emotional impact of the event.

Thursday, 24 April 2014

April 21st

To what extent is our social behaviour controlled by our brains chemistry?
I think our social behaviour is almost entirely based upon chemicals in our brain. if oxytocin can increase our trust, mood, arguments and general outlook on people. then there really leaves not much space in terms of social interactions that is not left to chemicals such as oxytocin.
Can we trust our feelings when making a decision?
I personally dont believe people should be making decisions when they are too happy, angry, sad, or confused. i find emotions tend to cloud a persons mind with thoughts that could lead to an individual favouring one thing over another even though it may not be a good choice for them.
How far can we trust the feeling of 'falling in love'?
Falling in love is considered a chemical feeling, but what determines what causes this chemical to be released when we see someone? studies have shown that a majority of what determines if we love someone is is body language and tone/speed of their voice, only 7% is up to what they say. its also found that it takes 90 seconds to about 4 mins for us to determine if we fancy someone. i personally feel maybe this is a bit like prematurely jumping to conclusions. someone could put on an "act" within that moment when we determine that we fancy someone. i guess thats why there is saying that first impressions are important.
To what extent should we chemically interfere with our feelings?
if we dont chemically interfere with our feelings, then how else are we meant to feel those feelings if they are brought up by chemicals? and can we even control the release of these chemicals?